Has Boots really made an anticapitalist film? Credit, public domain

There’s something very wrong with this Guardian review of the new movie “Sorry To Bother You.” Which is that it tells us all that this is a stunning indictment of capitalism, something which really doesn’t seem to be true at all. Rather, we have something which is akin to actually existing socialism. Or at least that socialism which existed before 1989.

These questions are at the core of Sorry to Bother You, a comedy-drama starring Lakeith Stanfield and Tessa Thompson, written and directed by Boots Riley, a rapper with Oakland band the Coup. Sorry to Bother You, set in an alternative version of that Californian city, is one of the most anti-capitalist movies Hollywood has ever produced.

Anticapitalist, eh? Try this:

Sorry to Bother You plays off all this, and America’s booming private prison sector, with the invention of a chilling entity called WorryFree, a jail-like workplace that guarantees employment, housing and food for life. In the nightmarish alternate reality conjured by the film, people are so eager to leave the rat race that they join WorryFree and find themselves housed in sweatshops with bunkbeds and matching jumpsuits.

The difference between that and Mao’s, Pol Pot’s, Ceausescu’s or Brezhnev’s version of socialism is what? And they want to call this film anticapitalist?

Guaranteed but terrible housing food and employment for life without that civil liberty or freedom. This is, well, it’s capitalism or socialism? Actually existing either that is?

Subscribe to The CT Mailer!

2
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
1 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Quentin VoleSpike Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Spike
Member

No, the movie portrays an American corporation as a socialist dystopia (with allusions to Negro slavery). (Which at least Google, for free-thinkers like Damore, was.) The lede in the Wikipedia article says the drama is the star’s Faustian choice between economic self-betterment and blessed Social Activism. Of course, in capitalism, you’d be free to set up a business that flouts this stereotype, and even has refrigerators full of free soda pop (a Silicon Valley staple) where workers are free to protest a new business initiative in China on company time even if they have no expertise to make the decision… Read more »

Quentin Vole
Member
Quentin Vole

“typical Hollywood anti-capitalism”, which is particularly ridiculous when you consider how hyper-capitalist Hollywood is (except for all the unionised ‘trades’).