Why Is Britain Leaving Brexit Money With The EU Instead Of Taking It?

4
953

This looks like a remarkably bad bit of negotiation here. It appears that we’re going to just make a gift to the European Union of some billions of pounds. Not even as part of some clever negotiation, nor in return for anything, but just because we’ve not bothered to ask for it. This is not, to put it mildly, sensible.

The underlying question goes to the heart of that whole divorce bill thing. For of course there isn’t a divorce bill. That £39 billion or whatever is what we’ve already agreed to pay in. We’ve agreed to pay it, we’re going to pay it. And we’d pay it if we stayed in, we’ll pay it if we come out. It’s not a payment contingent upon the decision to divorce therefore it’s not a divorce payment.

If you want to relate it to an actual divorce it’s like the electricity bill for what’s already been consumed. That’s going to be paid whether the couple stay together or not. So, it’s got nothing at all to do with the divorce.

However, that’s not true of the capital assets – just as in a divorce. Who gets the house matters. And we don’t go around valuing the house at what it was bought for either, we value it at current market. Exactly what isn’t being done here:

Britain has failed to push the EU for its share of profits from the European Investment Bank, a House of Lords committee has claimed, effectively giving up a €7.6bn (£6.6bn) prize. The EIB is owned by EU nations, which each contribute money to enable the fund to back infrastructure projects across the union. The UK will get back what it put in when it first financed the EIB, amounting to 16.1pc of the total pot, or almost €3.5bn. But the EIB has operated for decades and made profits on its loans. The total profits that have been retained in the fund amount to €47.3bn, giving the UK a stake of around €7.6bn.

We should indeed get our share of the capital assets back. Just as we should our cut of the parliament buildings, the embassies and all the rest that has been built with our money. Sure, only partially with our money but then we’re only asking for a part of that value back.

That the government isn’t demanding all this cash is proof that they’re not taking the situation seriously. Of course we should get our cut of the profits, the assets. And if we don’t then we shouldn’t pay those accrued bills either.

Unlike many news organisations, we chose an approach that means all our reporting is free and available for everyone. We need your support to keep delivering quality journalism, to maintain our openness and to protect our precious independence. Every reader contribution, big or small, is so valuable.
For as little as £1 (£10 if you were at OxBridge) you can support us – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.

Click Here To Make A Contribution - Tim & The Team