We’re told that it’s outrageous, an absolute scandal, that some employers don’t pay the minimum wage. That we could regard what willing employees turn up to work for as being their own business isn’t an argument which passes muster these days, more’s the pity. So, let’s ignore that argument and ponder on whether this is in fact a scandal.

Well, no, it doesn’t even rise to a scandalette.

A record £15.6m worth of underpayment to UK workers has been discovered by the government in the past year.

In total, 200,000 workers missed out on being paid at least the minimum wage rate – the highest number since the statutory rate was introduced in 1999.

Social care, commercial warehousing and the gig economy were the sectors most likely to underpay staff, HMRC said.

The point being that this is trivia in the context of the size of the economy:

Ministers have been urged to impose tougher penalties on companies that pay their staff below the minimum wage after it emerged that the government fined companies only £14m in a year when rogue employers underpaid their staff by £15.6m.

It is a criminal offence not to pay the minimum wage, and the maximum fine is 200% of every penny underpaid. Firms found in breach must also repay staff all the money they are owed.

100% fines look just fine to be honest. It’s how likely you are to be caught times the fine or punishment which is the incentive not to offend. If punishment happens to 100% of the incidence then even a 10% fine would be sufficient incentive not to underpay. The very argument that fines must be greater is proof that those making it think the State is pretty rubbish at uncovering the incidence.

However, consider it as a whole.

200,000 people. Be careful of that, as it might include things like care workers not being paid while they’re sleeping. Or adjustments that should or should not happen because of uniforms – both actual cases. But that still only 0.6% of the total workforce of around 30 million. We’re getting into rounding errors not commonplaces. And if we go to the money part. Total wages paid could be put at £660 billion (30 million working, median wages of £22k, so a large underestimate) at £15 million underpayment is 0.002%.

To put that into context, it’s not unusual for some 50 to 100 homicides in a year to lead to no suspects being charged. There are around 500,000 deaths in any one year. The failure to solve a murder is thus some five times worse than this incidence of underpaid wages across the economy. Seems pretty good for government work to be honest. And most certainly rather better than the burglary clean up rate…..

Subscribe to The CT Mailer!

6
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
3 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
SpikeBniCPJHRaffles Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Raffles
Member
Raffles

So, is the fine 100% or 200%? The article seems contradictory about that.

Otherwise, another fine rebuttal of usual rubbish we’re fed. Please keep them coming.

Spike
Member

The BBC reported that the transgressor pays 200% of the amount to the government (plus 100% of the amount owed to the employee). Tim follows this with a note that a mere 100% to the government, or 10%, would be sufficient, depending on the likelihood of getting caught.

PJH
Member
PJH

“A record £15.6m worth of underpayment to UK workers has been discovered by the government in the past year.

In total, 200,000 workers missed out on being paid at least the minimum wage rate – the highest number since the statutory rate was introduced in 1999.”

So, £15.6m, divided by 200K gives me…

£78.

Per person. Per year.

That sounds like statistical noise as well.

Spike
Member

And the blood lost in a fatal stabbing, averaged over the population, is less than a minor nosebleed. That doesn’t mean it is trivial to him what got stabbed. Here, the aggregates show that the vast majority obey the minimum-wage law, but some violate it. But the aggrieved party is not the employee, who if not paid a promised amount could claim fraud, but the useless Wage And Hour Division, the enforcer when legislators set prices wrong to show they care. They deserve as little sympathy as the Planning Board on finding that your back garden is out of compliance.… Read more »

BniC
Member
BniC

Is the problem that the definition of wage is so complicated that you will always have a certain level of underpayments which are just misunderstandings of the regulations, example being the uniform rules in this case.
Much the same way that tax audits turn up underpayments which are not deliberate evasions, just failure to interpret or follow all the rules, often the tax inspector will look at a specific area as they know they are common examples where people miss things, e.h. Tax treatment of hotel charges if you are provided with a feee newspaper

Spike
Member

“Technical violations” is at least part of it. Of course when you codify minimum wage (requiring at least sometimes that people be paid more than they are worth), some employers correct by skimping in other areas. The rulebook writers will codify more and more to prevent this.

The US minimum wage is mostly so low that most employees get more, or get substantial perks. Seattle restaurant workers have lost free parking and free food; they will get the new, super-high minimum, with no technical violations, but will be no better off.