Realist, not conformist analysis of the latest financial, business and political news

Baby Carter Cookson – Tragic, But Celebrate What Didn’t Happen

Carter Cookson, the weeks old baby who needed a heart transplant has died – this is tragic, of course it is, but we should pay at least a certain amount of attention to what did not happen. Another set of parents are not mourning their own child. For, as is so often not true in this world, heart transplants are a zero sum game. One must die so that a heart is available to transplant into another who will live.

Thus “appeals” for a heart to transplant aren’t really quite the right thing:

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]Baby Carter Cookson has died after appeal for heart donor fails
His parents had made a desperate plea for an organ donor for the newborn who suffered heart problems.[/perfectpullquote]

The thing is, near all organs that are viable for transplant are already used for transplant. As the change in the law in Wales showed – moving to a presumed consent system hasn’t increased the number of transplants happening at all. So appealing for one doesn’t really quite work.

This isn’t true of most of life – the economy is a positive sum game for example – and it’s not even true of most transplants. Live kidney transplants are so obviously possible that we’ve got to stop people paying for them. Lungs and livers too – people can indeed, and do, live donate a lobe.

Hearts though? Sadly, we’ve each only the one and we do rather require it ourselves:

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””] A three-week-old baby who was in desperate need of a heart transplant has died, his parents have said. Carter Cookson, who was born prematurely on Boxing Day with heart problems, had suffered three cardiac arrests and was on a life-support machine. His parents Sarah and Chris Cookson had been running a social media appeal to find a donor. [/perfectpullquote]

Often enough those who have lost a loved one whose organs were used to save other lives go on to talk about how that saving aided their grief. This isn’t going to aid Carter’s parents but it’s true all the same. That lack of a heart to save his life means someone elses’ baby hadn’t died so that it could be provided.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Total
0
Shares
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jonathan Harston
Jonathan Harston
5 years ago

And the more we improve the life-chances of little bundles of premature joy, the less there will be a supply of post-mortem donations from said bundles.

Charlie Hill
Charlie Hill
5 years ago

Pardon!?! Disgusting.

nae a belger
nae a belger
5 years ago
Reply to  Charlie Hill

He’s basically saying as more babies survive through the first few years there will be less dead babies to take organs from. Which is obvious really

Shadeburst
Shadeburst
5 years ago
Reply to  nae a belger

Mein Gott it’s FEWER! Mine FEWER!

BarksintheCountry
BarksintheCountry
5 years ago
Reply to  Shadeburst

See ‘pedants’ revolt’ in google.

timworstall
timworstall
5 years ago

For odd and historic reasons we tend to call it pendantry around here….

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x